Core Objectives Processes

Basic Objective Processes
Core Level Processes

Cumulative Index

FUTURE AND SURVIVAL

Find a Brand New World
Survive
Look Around Here, What Could You Have?
Objective ARC

HOLDING A POSITION

Objective Show Me
Motion
Tolerance of Motion and Stillness
Allying Control
Places Where You Are Not
Buttered All Over

NOT KNOW PROCESSES

Look Around Here and Find Something You Wouldn't Mind Forgetting
Objective Not Know
Objective Forgettingness

POWER OF CHOICE, OBSESSIONS, FIXATIONS

An Objective Rundown, No. 8
Unspotting
Locational, Body and Room
Control Process

MOSTLY HAVINGNESS

Unconfrontable Beingness
8C
CCH Havingness Process

CCHs AND VARIATIONS

Don't Give Me That Hand
CCH 1 to 4
CCH 1 - Give me that hand
CCH 2-Tone 40 8-C
CCH 3 - Hand Space Mimicry
CCH 4 - Book Mimcry
CCH 5 - Objective Havingness
CCH 6 - Objective Havingness with Body
CCH 7 - Contact by Duplication
Control Trio
CCH 8 - Trio
Factual Havingness
Third Rail Factual Havingness
Trio on Terminals
Trio on Valences
Responsibility
Objective Havingness - Assists for Body Parts
Keep It There
CCH 9 - Keep It From Going Away
Observation of Objects
Keep It From Going Away
Keep It From Going Away on the Body
Glass Objects
Motionlessness
CCH 10 - Hold It Still
Hold It Still
CCH 11 - Make it a Little More Solid
Make It More Solid
CCH 18

UPON ARRIVAL

Look Around and Tell me Something you Could Do
Process to Widen PT
What Wouldn't you Mind Occupying the Same Space you are Occupying?
Ought to Be
Another Process to Widen PT
Axiom 10 Process
SCS on an Object
SCS on the Body
Can't Run 8-C
SOP 8C

Control Trio

References

HCOB 11 June 1957 "Training and CCH Processes"

PAB No. 137 "Some More CCH Processes "

PAB No. 146 "Procedure CCH "

PAB No. 120 "Control Trio"

Description

Thinkingness in general should not be suspected of being under anybody's control, much less the processor's, but it is probably more under the processor's control that it is under the client's control. You can do it better than the person, but that is horribly bad, and when you get this clear, you will see that you have to get the body under control and get attention under control before you aim at thinkingness.

Therefore, a condition to running Trio is this: Is the person's body under control, is the person's attention under control -- those are two conditions necessary to run Trio. To assume that power of choice is also under the person's control -- much less thinkingness -- is of course, pretty grim. It moves Trio outrageously high. So you could say that there are two versions of Trio.

Trio would be just Trio just the way it is. But there is an undercut in Trio. Trio could be a directive process, and it would be prefaced by "Get the idea of having that clock." That is highly directive, that would keep thinkingness under control in the kind of case who was having a rough time with it.

The second version: "Get the idea that it would be all right for that clock to remain as it is." That is just an indicating process.

Instead of "dispense with" or "not-know" at command three, we run into actually a brand new process. Its rationale is much higher. "Get the idea of making that clock disappear." Small objects are much easier for the person to make disappear than large ones, but you haven't told him to make it disappear. You have told him to get the idea of making it disappear. They usually interpret you literally and try like mad to make it disappear, and it usually does for a short time. This gets him to take over the automaticity of all the losses that he has experienced unwillingly. It's the universe that's been taking the things away, and an individual, just by spotting objects and getting the idea that they are going to disappear or are disappearing. Of course, then he does take over this automaticity of losses, and he becomes accustomed to it after awhile and he should come out of the woods on it.

Therefore, you have a highly directional, a highly workable set of processes, and each part of that Trio would be run relatively flat and go on to the next part. I would say you'd probably run it something on the order of, certainly not a hundred commands each. You'd try to stay in that order of magnitude, and you could just run it round and round.

Commands

1. "Notice that (indicated object) and get the idea of having it."

2. Notice that (indicated object) and get the idea of permitting it to continue."

3. "Notice that (indicated object) and get the idea of making it disappear."

Run each command until it is flat before going on to the next command (i.e., 1 would be run until flat, then command 2 would be run until flat, then command 3 would be run until flat, then return to command 1). This would be continued until all three commands no longer produced any change.

End Point

Run the process until a realization occurs, or an ability is regained.

Cautions

None


These objective assist processes are excerpted and compiled from the works of L. Ron Hubbard as part of a study of the Briefing Course materials. They are made available here for the purpose of discussion on spirit-l. Spirit-l is a list intended for the discussion of the philosophical underpinnings of clearing philosophies and methods. Frequent topics include self-betterment processes that can be done alone or in a coprocessing setting. There are "fair use" considerations as the works these quotations are taken from are copyrighted. The actual owner of the copyrights seems to be in question, but it most certainly is not I. Therefore, these fair use excerpts are available for Spirit-l list subscribers to prepare for, and participate in, the on-line discussion. It is also for others who, although unable to participate in the discussion of Hubbard's work at this time (perhaps lacking email access or available time), would like to prepare for such discussion on the above thread topics in the future. Just as one can copy a chapter out of a book to teach a class, and even a whole book using a chapter for each class, separate supplementary manuals will facilitate the different on-line discussion topics.


Webmistress