((Editor's comments in double parenthesis - Homer))

EXM 47
Simple Parent and Child Overt Running with Subjects

Copyright (C) 1992 A Voice of the Free Zone (Electra)
Redistribution rights granted for non commercial purposes.

Find out what subject your pc is the most bonkers on. Then run the following on that subject using the 8 flows of forgetfulness.

Say the subject was sex.

(1) 'What have you done as a mother to a child on the subject of sex?'

(2) 'What has a mother done to you as a child on the subject of sex?'

(3) 'What has a child done to you as a mother on the subject of sex?'

(4) 'What have you done as a child to a mother on the subject of sex?'

(5) etc.

Then run 'withheld from' in place of 'done to'.

(1) 'What have you withheld as a mother from a child on the subject of sex?'

Run the above on Sex, Immortality, Mortality, Religion, War, Education/Schooling, Food, Work, Production, Having Children and and Money. Also run it on any subject the pc originates and wants to run.

Parent and Child

You have had many mothers and been many mothers.

You have had many children and been many children.

You have had a worst mother, and a best mother.

You have been a worst mother and a best mother.

You have had a worst child and a best child.

You have been a worst child and a best child.

When people are mortal (you know, live once, die once, impending worm food) they take everything very seriously. Often your pc will have his present mother confused with his worst mother or his best mother, or worse, with his own BEING a worst mother or best mother. It will go a long ways towards straightening out his time track if you can get his present mother located on a gradient scale with respect to all the mothers he has ever had and been. If his present mother turns out to be his worst mother, that's fine.

Find out his worst life time AS a mother and run it against mommy dear in this life.

'What have you done as a mother to a child?'

'What have you withheld as a mother from a child?'

'What has a mother done to you as a child?'

'What has a mother withheld from you as a child?'

'What has a child done to you as a mother?'

'What has a child withheld from you as a mother?'

'What have you done as a child to a mother?'

'What have you withheld as a child from a mother?'

If 'withheld from' dries up, try 'withheld about'.

In the 60's LRH came up with a process which involved having the pc list out terminals of interest to him and then running Overt/ Withhold on the terminal that read the most.

Let's say the pc listed his mother, Aunt Agatha and his 3rd grade school teacher, Miss Jones. If his mother read the most, they would take up that terminal. However LRH always made a point of never running a specific single person terminal, but always running a GENERAL TERMINAL. Thus 'my mother' was changed to 'a mother' and that was run. This is because your pc has had hundreds of mothers down the track and he has probably detested every one of them, except for a rare few whom he loved dearly and is still looking for.

Thus it is a waste of time to run his present mother only, as she is a late lock on a very heavy chain of hundreds of mothers that goes back to the beginning of time.

Thus you will notice that the 8 flows of forgetfulness always use A MOTHER and A CHILD and never use YOUR MOTHER or YOUR CHILD.

So once a terminal was chosen, LRH had the auditor run,

'What have you done to a Mother?'

'What have you withheld from a Mother?'

Once the terminal was flat, that is produced no more TA action, or cognitions or case gain, the auditor would relist, or reassess the old list, and a new terminal would then be chosen and the same process would be run on it. Apparently people went clear on this.

I can't imagine how.

The obvious idea is that if a terminal reads when it is assessed or the pc originates it, it must have charge on it that can be run. But who is to say that the charge is on 'done TO a mother' and not on 'done AS a mother'?

Further, terminals never exist alone in a vacuum, they always exist as a terminal pair. The CHARGE is on the conflict and opposition between the TWO terminals. If there had only been you, you could never have gotten into trouble. It takes two to tango. This goes right into GPMs and of course there is no such thing as a one sided GPM, so once you find a terminal such as 'a mother' you should then also find what terminal was opposite to it in the GPM, such as 'a child' or 'a son' or even 'a father' or 'a lover' etc.

If the conflict was between mother and child with the pc as the child in this life, then you can be sure the pc was a mother in a past life giving hell to some poor child, who probably returned it in like kind.

Thus if you want to do this kind of auditing, and I highly recommend it, once you find a hot terminal pair on your pc, run the following. Say the terminal pair was mother and child,

1.) 'What have you done as a mother?'

2.) 'What have you done to a mother?'

3.) 'What have you done as a child?'

4.) 'What have you done to a child?'

These questions are very broad. 'What have you done as a mother?' includes 'to a child' but also includes everything else that mothers do. Just so 'What have you done to a child?' includes as a mother, but also as everything else that can do things to a child.

So this should clean up mother and child along with a lot of other stuff.

You should also run the following as above,

'What have you withheld as a mother?'

'What have you withheld from a mother?'

'What have you withheld as a child?'

'What have you withheld from a child?'

As usual 'withhold' means to restrain one's self from being, doing, or having, and it also means to not tell someone what one has already been, done or had. Reword these questions into past, present, or future tense as you see fit.

During the period of time referred to above, LRH was very much against running the motivator side of the equation. He said it just helped the pc commit another overt by letting him even talk about what had been done to him.

The remaining four questions would be left out.

'What has been done to you as a mother?'

'What has been done to you as a child?'

'What has been withheld from you as a mother?'

'What has been withheld from you as a child?'

I have found though that it is important to run all possible flows of this. This is because people fall down below knowing that anything was ever done to them! If they can't tell you what was done to them, they will never be able to tell you what they did to others. Thus you have to get all of it.

I leave it up to you how to run this. When you get high enough you probably will be happy just running the overt side of it, but my own experience tells me that motivators and overts, and deds and dedex's are forgotten in pairs, and trying to run one side of the pair is begging for a jam.

Electra



Psychology of Reformation

Psychology of Religion

Index of Available Articles

Graphical Site Map

Next in Electra series

Contents - Volume 1

Contents - Volume 2

Contents - Volume 3