[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
John C. Randolph (jcr@idiom.com) wrote:
: Well, I for one will never consider working for Intel. The next time
: any headhunter asks me if I'm interested in doing contract sysadmin work
: at Intel, I'll tell him that Intel's just too dangerous to work for.
This is regardless of intel. If the law allows prosecution, ANY company
could suddenly decide to take advantage of it. The law is the point in
question here - not intel's use of it. The fact that the law ALLOWED
intel's reaction is the problem.
Follow-Ups:
References: