Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?

• Subject: Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• From: Rahul Dhesi <dhesi@rahul.net>
• Date: 3 Jan 1996 04:48:39 GMT
• Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk, comp.security.unix, comp.security.misc, misc.legal.computing, comp.sys.intel
• Organization: a2i network
• References: <slrn4egrc2.974.jeffrey@jeffrey.vip.best.com> <4cb2hp$e1h@hecate.umd.edu> <slrn4ejer0.c8q.jeffrey@jeffrey.vip.best.com> <4ccos2$4c9@news.xs4all.nl>
• Xref: nntp.teleport.com comp.org.eff.talk:68512 comp.security.unix:23385 comp.security.misc:24399 misc.legal.computing:18522 comp.sys.intel:70691

In <4ccos2$4c9@news.xs4all.nl> cor@xs4all.nl (Cor Bosman) writes:

>I guess it's time for all sysadmins around the world to start using
>forms for every little change they make, and have it signed by management.

Only sysadmins at Intel.  Not every company is as stupid.
-- 
Rahul Dhesi <dhesi@rahul.net>
"please ignore Dhesi" -- Mark Crispin <mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU>

• Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• From: jcaruso@sr.csg.com (John Caruso)
• Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• From: curtakin@aol.com (CurtAkin)

• Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• From: jeffrey@algor2.algorists.com (Jeffrey Kegler)
• Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• From: ram@mbisgi.umd.edu (Ram Samudrala)
• Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• From: jeffrey@algor2.algorists.com (Jeffrey Kegler)
• Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• From: cor@xs4all.nl (Cor Bosman)

• Prev: Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• Next: Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• Index: Mail Index
• Thread: Mail Thread Index