Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?

• Subject: Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• From: cor@xs4all.nl (Cor Bosman)
• Date: 3 Jan 1996 02:15:30 GMT
• Distribution: inet
• Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk, comp.security.unix, comp.security.misc, misc.legal.computing, comp.sys.intel
• Organization: XS4ALL, networking for the masses
• References: <slrn4egrc2.974.jeffrey@jeffrey.vip.best.com> <4cb2hp$e1h@hecate.umd.edu> <slrn4ejer0.c8q.jeffrey@jeffrey.vip.best.com>
• Xref: nntp.teleport.com comp.org.eff.talk:68484 comp.security.unix:23383 comp.security.misc:24394 misc.legal.computing:18520 comp.sys.intel:70676

I guess it's time for all sysadmins around the world to start using
forms for every little change they make, and have it signed by management.

'Dear management, I am about to remove a spurious lockfile. Please grant
me permission.'.

Cor
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cor Bosman     |  ____Xs4all Public Access____  |  tel: +31-(0)20-622-2885 |
| cor@xs4all.net |     Network Administrator      |  fax: +31-(0)20-622-2753 |
-------------The building is clear, Leisa has crossed the bridge-------SP6----

• Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• From: Rahul Dhesi <dhesi@rahul.net>
• Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• From: adt@netcom.com (Anthony D. Tribelli)
• Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• From: Kevin Martinez <lps@rahul.net>

• Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• From: jeffrey@algor2.algorists.com (Jeffrey Kegler)
• Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• From: ram@mbisgi.umd.edu (Ram Samudrala)
• Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• From: jeffrey@algor2.algorists.com (Jeffrey Kegler)

• Prev: Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• Next: Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• Index: Mail Index
• Thread: Mail Thread Index