Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?

• Subject: Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• From: ram@mbisgi.umd.edu (Ram Samudrala)
• Date: 2 Jan 1996 10:48:25 GMT
• Distribution: world
• Followup-To: comp.org.eff.talk,comp.security.unix,comp.security.misc,misc.legal.computing,comp.sys.intel
• Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk, comp.security.unix, comp.security.misc, misc.legal.computing, comp.sys.intel
• Organization: The Centre for Advanced Research in Biotechnology
• References: <slrn4egrc2.974.jeffrey@jeffrey.vip.best.com>
• Reply-To: me@ram.org
• Xref: nntp.teleport.com comp.org.eff.talk:68356 comp.security.unix:23364 comp.security.misc:24380 misc.legal.computing:18499 comp.sys.intel:70594

Is there anyway this decision can be appealed at a higher court?  Like
the Supreme Court?

--Ram

me@ram.org  ||  http://www.ram.org  ||  http://www.twisted-helices.com/th
She's blinding, I'm flying,         right behind the rear-view mirror now.
Got the feeling, power steering,   Pistons popping, ain't no stopping now!
                                                               --Van Halen

• Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• From: jeffrey@algor2.algorists.com (Jeffrey Kegler)

• Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• From: jeffrey@algor2.algorists.com (Jeffrey Kegler)

• Prev: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• Next: Re: Intel v. Randal Schwartz: Why care?
• Index: Mail Index
• Thread: Mail Thread Index