Re: Intel blows it again

• Subject: Re: Intel blows it again
• From: sean@sdg.dra.com (Sean Donelan)
• Date: 1 Aug 95 17:21:08 CDT
• Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel, misc.legal.computing
• Organization: Data Research Associates, St. Louis MO
• References: <3vm2ta$jvs@nntp.Stanford.EDU>
• Xref: nntp.teleport.com comp.sys.intel:53862 misc.legal.computing:14882

In article <3vm2ta$jvs@nntp.Stanford.EDU>, ibrahim@apollo13.Stanford.EDU (Nabeel Robert Ibrahim) writes:
> Being shot for jaywalking?!?!?  Please, if you want to have a serious
> discussion, don't make idiotic comments like that.
> 
> What ever happened to personal responsibility?  Why can't people accept
> the fact that they must pay the price if they break the law?  If you
> jaywalk, you should be willing to pay the price if caught.

You should pay the penalty set by the legislature for jaywalking.

The disagreement is whether you should also have to pay for for the 
new stoplights and a crosswalk the city decided to install at the
site of your jaywalking.
-- 
Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO
  Affiliation given for identification not representation

• Re: Intel blows it again
• From: "John S. Kotches" <johnk@sigg.com>
• Re: Intel blows it again
• From: wsanders@netcom.com (Wiley Sanders)

• Re: Intel blows it again
• From: ibrahim@apollo13.Stanford.EDU (Nabeel Robert Ibrahim)

• Prev: Re: Intel blows it again
• Next: Re: Perl Co-inventor Convicted
• Index: Mail Index
• Thread: Mail Thread Index