Re: Intel blows it again

• Subject: Re: Intel blows it again
• From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz)
• Date: 01 Aug 1995 15:19:33 -0700
• In-reply-to: ibrahim@apollo13.Stanford.EDU's message of 1 Aug 1995 20:30:34 GMT
• Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel, misc.legal.computing
• Organization: Stonehenge Consulting Services; Portland, Oregon, USA
• References: <3vm2ta$jvs@nntp.Stanford.EDU>
• Reply-To: merlyn@stonehenge.com
• Sender: merlyn@linda.teleport.com
• Xref: nntp.teleport.com comp.sys.intel:53800 misc.legal.computing:14873

>>>>> "Nabeel" == Nabeel Robert Ibrahim <ibrahim@apollo13.Stanford.EDU> writes:

Nabeel> I'm sorry, but that's just pure BS.  He knew what he was doing (I've read
Nabeel> his account of the story) and he knew the laws.  By his own admission,
Nabeel> he knew he was breaking the law.  What's unfair about punishing someone
Nabeel> who was breaking the law??  Please explain...

Your conclusion is based on a false premise.  "he knew the laws"
applies only *after* I read through them with my attorneys.  There
were no big fanfares when the law was passed in 1985.

Please don't make up facts.
-- 
Name: Randal L. Schwartz / Stonehenge Consulting Services (503)777-0095
Keywords: Perl training, UNIX[tm] consulting, video production, skiing, flying
Email: <merlyn@stonehenge.com> Snail: (Call) PGP-Key: (finger merlyn@ora.com)
Web: <A HREF="http://www.teleport.com/~merlyn/">My Home Page!</A>

• Re: Intel blows it again
• From: saarela@news-server.engin.umich.edu (aaron james saarela)
• Re: Intel blows it again
• From: Dan.Pop@mail.cern.ch (Dan Pop)
• Re: Intel blows it again
• From: schow@bnr.ca (Stanley T.H. Chow)

• Re: Intel blows it again
• From: ibrahim@apollo13.Stanford.EDU (Nabeel Robert Ibrahim)

• Prev: Re: Perl Co-inventor Convicted
• Next: Re: Intel blows it again
• Index: Mail Index
• Thread: Mail Thread Index