Re: Perl Co-inventor Convicted

• Subject: Re: Perl Co-inventor Convicted
• From: sspoon@hubcap.clemson.edu (Lex Spoon)
• Date: 30 Jul 1995 05:59:27 GMT
• Newsgroups: misc.legal.computing
• Organization: Clemson University
• References: <wsandersDCE99K.3DH@netcom.com> <3vaunk$4u4@hpindda.cup.hp.com> <3vav1t$4u4@hpindda.cup.hp.com> <3vb3vm$llj@engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM>

Bryant Durrell [Contractor] (durrell@innocence.eng.sun.com) wrote:
: In article <3vav1t$4u4@hpindda.cup.hp.com>,
: Bob Kelley <bkelley@cup.hp.com> wrote:
: >Gosh.  If I run Crack, does that make me a criminal in Oregon?

: It's generally unprofessional to run crack on your employer's password
: files without prior authorization.  I believe that Randal didn't have
: malicious intent, but I can't blame Intel for being paranoid.

Unless you are a security consultant, in which case it is probably
unprofessional NOT to run Crack... :-)

So does anyone know what _really_ happened?

Lex

• Re: Perl Co-inventor Convicted
• From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz)

• Perl Co-inventor Convicted
• From: wsanders@netcom.com (Wiley Sanders)
• Re: Perl Co-inventor Convicted
• From: bkelley@cup.hp.com (Bob Kelley)
• Re: Perl Co-inventor Convicted
• From: bkelley@cup.hp.com (Bob Kelley)
• Re: Perl Co-inventor Convicted
• From: durrell@innocence.eng.sun.com (Bryant Durrell [Contractor])

• Prev: Convicted of felonies while doing my job as sys admin (you should be worried)
• Next: Re: Perl Co-inventor Convicted
• Index: Mail Index
• Thread: Mail Thread Index