[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Schwartz conviction
>>>>> "Rob" == Rob Vaughn <robv@news> writes:
Rob> I have heard the *rumor* that Schwartz had used Crack against Intel
Rob> machines at least once after he was let go by Intel, and that his
Rob> leaving was not on amicable terms. As I haven't been following this
Rob> in the Oregonian, I am curious if any of the articles can confirm or
Rob> deny this case. Has anyone seen anything to this effect?
Rob> Repeat: the above is a rumor only, which I intend to forget immediately
Rob> unless someone can quote something that confirms or denies it.
"running crack against intel machines at least once after he was let
go by Intel" -- Completely false. No evidence even suggesting that
was brought up at the trial. That was not part of any allegation made
by the state or accusation made by Intel. (Gosh, the rumor mill must
be going nuts!)
"his leaving was not on amicable terms" -- I should say not! I was
forcibly terminated during the search and seizure of all computers at
my house. After 40 days, they were returned to me. Nothing out of
line was found on the computers, even after having done a thorough
search. Not even a note saying "we're sorry for taking away the tools
of your trade and your address book and your checkbook for 40 days." :-)
See my legal defense fund server (fund@stonehenge.com) for further
information.
--
Name: Randal L. Schwartz / Stonehenge Consulting Services (503)777-0095
Keywords: Perl training, UNIX[tm] consulting, video production, skiing, flying
Email: <merlyn@stonehenge.com> Snail: (Call) PGP-Key: (finger merlyn@ora.com)
Web: <A HREF="http://www.teleport.com/~merlyn/">My Home Page!</A>
References: