[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Schwartz conviction
-
Subject: Re: Schwartz conviction
-
From: robv@news (Rob Vaughn)
-
Date: 27 Jul 1995 18:58:02 GMT
-
Distribution: or
-
Newsgroups: or.general
-
Organization: news
Joshua R. Poulson (jrp@teleport.com) wrote:
: Andrew Burke <aburke@qiclab.scn.rain.com> wrote:
: >(Why didn't Intel just fire him?? Surely there
: >were others in Intel running Crack just to see what's possible)
: The lynching is a result of the fact that Randal was arrogant and
: pointed out VERY real security defects in the organization.
I have heard the *rumor* that Schwartz had used Crack against Intel
machines at least once after he was let go by Intel, and that his
leaving was not on amicable terms. As I haven't been following this
in the Oregonian, I am curious if any of the articles can confirm or
deny this case. Has anyone seen anything to this effect?
Repeat: the above is a rumor only, which I intend to forget immediately
unless someone can quote something that confirms or denies it.
Rob V.
--
robv@teleport.com
Follow-Ups: