Re: Randall's Lawsuit

Subject: Re: Randall's Lawsuit
From: kgb@ast.cam.ac.uk (Karl Glazebrook)
Date: 13 Jul 1995 13:42:38 GMT
Apparently-To: merlyn@teleport.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.perl.misc
Organization: Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
References: <3u112h$3pg@wsinti05.win.tue.nl>
Reply-To: kgb@ast.cam.ac.uk

In article <ukwxdodv2c.fsf@linda.teleport.com>, merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) writes:
>1) it's not a lawsuit... it's a criminal case.
>
>2) have you ever played poker?
>
>3) haven't you noticed that we have *not* heard more than tiny "leaks"
>about the defense theory in the OJ trial?
>
>I think from this it is obvious why I can't speak about the cards I am
>holding until the game is complete (just two weeks away... trial began
>yesterday).

Ah yes of course, it WAS obvious. 

Sorry Randal, apologies for the misspelling,  I will shut up now.

Karl
-- 
kgb@ast.cam.ac.uk  Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge, U.K.
publications:      http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~kgb/papers.html
pgperl software:   http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~kgb/pgperl.html

References:

Re: Randall's Lawsuit

From: hansm@wsinti05.win.tue.nl (Hans Mulder)

Prev: Re: Schwartz VS. Intel
Next: Re: Schwartz VS. Intel
Index: Mail Index
Thread: Mail Thread Index