[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Randall's Lawsuit
kgb@ast.cam.ac.uk wrote:
> I am curious as to why Randall can not discuss details of his lawsuit.
>
> After all if every detail of the OJ case can be broadcast coast to
> coast surely he is entitled to report what at least what he has been
> accused of?
You probably haven't heard too many statements from OJ himself, since
anything he said could then be used against him in court. Same goes for
Randal. While he could probably disseminate a written statement approved
by his lawyers, containing nothing but a bare statement of the case facts,
he would need to *pay* his lawyers to approve it (note the purpose of the
T-shirt you liked...); and it is always better to err on the side of
caution when surrounded by vipers.
Besides, any statement by Randal in this forum would likely spur another
long discussion of the case, which is not something that most people want
(hint, hint).
M. Hedlund <hedlund@best.com>
[n.b.: I tend to post and mail my responses to news articles.]
References: