Ice Dragon: Hamburg NY- March 17, 2007

Hosted by the Barony of the Rhydderich Hael

Mistress Rhiannon y Bwa, Pentocrat- email LAS52 AT

Guidelines for writing good documentation for Ice Dragon

There are many ways to document your entry. This is a complex and often confusing subject. Therefore, Rhiannon the Pentocrat, along with some very brave and generous former entrants (Thank them!,) are going to show you approaches used in past Ice D's, with comments.

Below you'll see the pros and cons, strengths and weaknesses of several ways to write up what you know about your entry. In some cases, you'll see the URL of the original documentation with the original images, etc. The comments are in RED along with suggested score increasing activities in BLUE on the downloadable pdf comment versions. In some cases, especially with the simpler 'mockup' documentation, you'll see estimated scores- they are a guess only, not a guarantee.

Mockup's: the bascinet's three levels along with some of the simplified versions of Bridgette's hat are not 'real entries' but mimic some seen in the past.

Please provide the following information with each entry:

A. What

B. When

C. Where

D. Technique/Materials PERIOD

E. Technique/Materials MODERN

F. Your entry code for the item (see the category chart under rules for Ice Dr URL) and a unique code for you, the contestant (this is obtained at the registration table when you check in.)

Items A-F: from one to three typewritten pages (one side). It is wise not to exceed 10 pages in this section. (experienced researchers: choose your own path here!)

Additional Items G& H(Below) = unlimited pages

G. Bibliography (Alphabetical by author(s), date, title, publisher, location (specific pgs a plus); URLs with webpages, author, title. [Footnotes can be used instead, same info included].

H. Appendix if desired (very helpful: step-by-step process photos; images of extant objects; tools used, Period; tools used, Modern; excerpts of rare documentation with highlighted passages; samples, etc.) Pagination of Appendix can be used to point to Appendix locations from 3 pager above.

In Addition: All Ice Dragon entries must also have TWO 3x5 cards to identify them both during the judging process

1. anonymous judging card WITHOUT your name on it)

and after the judging process when we place a ribbon on your entry:

2. Ribbon card with your SCA name on it - contact info would be nice, like an email address, if possible ,as well). This second 'ribbon' card is essential in identifying you and making sure you get the right ribbon.

Please provide items A-F above on both of those cards. 3x5 cards are available on the day of the competition or you can bring your pre-filled out cards with you. Do not include your name on the judging card OR on your entry. The judging card is the only information on your item available to the public the morning viewing hours (documentation will be restricted to judges only during that time period).

NEW: 'Documenting Your Work' how-to (by Mistress Alicia Langland)

PDF version (click here)

MS Word version (click here)

NEW: Be sure to read the guidelines for Plagarism/citing other people's work

Documentation examples with Comments:

Alexander's Bascinet example: This is a 'pretend' entry at 3 levels: very sparse info, medium info and a simple one pager, along with comments on possible point score outcomes. The same exact object is described in each one.

Commentary/documentation (pdf)

Juliana's Tablet Woven Pouch: Ice Dragon 1st time entrant's documentation.

Commentary/documentation (pdf)

Phiala's Needles: Documentation of a very 'spare' style. Elegant and complete.

Commentary/documentation (pdf)

Valgardr's Viking trim on a Hat: like Phiala's work, this documentation excels in its succinct format, while hitting all the high points:

Commentary/document (pdf)

Bedwyr's Rushlights: example of a "novel" study where there isn't a lot of Period how-to info on subject.

Commentary/document (pdf)

Bridgette's Hat: an example of a complex project (longer page length):

Commentary/document (pdf)

Gille and Nanzydon's Vitruvius' Scorpion (huge weapon): An example of a huge project involved two artisans and lengthy research (25 pgs). Careful organization of supporting material is CRITICAL here to be certain the judges can navigate thru it all. Works better as a research paper, considering length and detail supplied.

Katja's Ymber day tart: no commentary; good example of using footnotes instead of a stand-alone bibliography. Harder for judges to quickly check the level of the sources by flipping to the stand-alone bibliography, though.

Odriana's Roasted Chicken with Stuffing: commentary not available. Another nicely organized documentation arrangement.


If you have questions on these categories, please email the Pentocrat , Mistress Rhiannon y Bwa: LAS52 AT Thank you.

Page last modified 12/02/06

Return to Rhiannon's Delights