************************************************************************ The following first appeared in the private email list IVy-subscribers, which is available to all those who subscribe to the printed magazine, International Viewpoints. ************************************************************************ Whatever happened to the sperm-ovum sequence? by Phil Spickler 17 Jul 1998 Back in the almost prehistoric days of Book 1 Dianetics, and in the quest for the Holy Grail known as Clear, there was the belief, nay, the postulate, nay, the fact, that if you could reach something called Basic- Basic, namely the great-great-great-great-grandfather of all engrams, and then run this incident to erasure and clean up everything that lay upon it, you would indeed be looking at a Clear. Some preclears in the quest for Basic- Basic ran into an incident or set of incidents that came to be described as the sperm-ovum sequence, and for a few of these, at least, this proved to be Basic-Basic. As an aside, the business of going earlier often led people into incidents that for all intents and purposes were quite a bit earlier than anything having to do with the this-lifetime body -- this phenomenon got treated in all kinds of different ways, depending on who you were and who was doing the auditing, since prior to the publishing of the Dianetic axioms, the 1950 picture was essentially this lifetime and four dynamics: not a bad package. And if it wasn't horribly abused by attempting to audit people past enormous wins, there were indeed a fair number of people who did, if but temporarily, achieve states that looked pretty darned clear. One of the most famous at that time was a chap known as The Minnesota Clear, and he exhibited practically all of the attributes that a Clear should possess, as described in _Dianetics, the Modern Science of Mental Health_. I kind of lost track of his exploits, but a few years later heard that he had become a Catholic priest. I shall make no further comment about him at this time. But anyway, let's pick up our story at the sperm-ovum sequence and look at some of the fascinating aspects that appear with an increased understanding of just what this sequence is all about. As we know, Ron Hubbard, in some ways along the same chain as Sigmund Freud, was looking for hidden influences that could and did explain much of the aberrated behavior of human beings. Is it possible that the interaction between sperm and ovum, the two consitutents of the human body, could contain pre-programed survival items that might later become dramatized by the mature product of such a union? I'd say the answer to that question is "YES." Just for example, consider the life of a single sperm in intense competition with millions of its own kind in a desperate struggle to be Number 1. In the world of the sperm, there's no analytical fooling around, there's no pan-determined looking out for the welfare of others, there's no "After you, my dear Alphonse" -- it's absolute tooth and claw, with the whole potential for the survival of the human race built into each one of these individuals, with only one chance to create the union that will create the possibility of biological immortality. The stakes are pretty high, the goal extremely important, and if you can imagine the struggle and then look at some of the characters, mostly male, that have been spawned in this world, you may, with a great chuckle or even a succession of loud laughs, get the idea of what drives some of our most frantic and fanatic historical figures into the enormous excesses that their lives display to the rest of us. For a moment let's turn our attention to the ovum. Here again we have one single possibility for this individual to attain biological immortality; the ovum in its environment is more or less in a passive state, unable to actively influence its position but intending with all its heart and soul to reach a point that will be most favorable to the consummation of the union. The ovum cannot penetrate the sperm, but must serve itself as a target and intend with all its might to be penetrated. There are of course numerous attitudes, emotions, intentions, and postulates built into and around this amazing creature that can and do often explain behavioral problems in both sexes, just as those of the sperm also can explain behavioral problems in both sexes, since once the union of the two does occur, all the memories and desperate possibilities that both have been through become part and parcel of the product of that union. It is somewhat laughable, as well as extremely tragic, to see the degree to which mature specimens of our biology are driven to make the sperm-ovum sequence possible, without perhaps consciously realizing that the whole future of the human race depends on this sequence, not on Scientology or Dianetics as Ron, without putting his tongue into his cheek, claimed in the bulletin "Keeping Scientology Working." Anyhow, in the shaping of individual humans and their destiny, most of us don't laugh about and are made uncomfortable by being told that the biggest reason for our existence is simply to make possible future existence, and that it in large part consists of getting these microorganisms into a favorable location for this to happen; that we're just a bunch of good-looking seedbearers. Well, we're all fond of thinking there's a lot more to it than that, and I would tend to agree that this is the case; howsomever, this seems to be a big part of what it's all about, and many of the constructs of civilization and the great and various trappings that we clothe our actions in come down to this simple basic point of survival. Does this throw out all the ideas about theta and thetans and spiritual immortality and high states of conssciousness? I don't think so, but I think you'll agree with me that the influences hidden in this area and dramatized by human beings, both sadly and humorously, contribute a great deal to the Sturm-und- Drang of life, and certainly can and often do make great fools of us. When Ron Hubbard wrote _Advanced Procedures and Axioms_ and published it, this became one of his least popular books, and in one or more talks that I heard him make in 1957, in a meeting we were having about book sales, he claimed with lots of laughing that one of the big reasons that this book never sold very well was that in it he had said the basic aberration is to be human, and that an immortal consciousness couldn't get any crazier than when it was trying to do the only thing it could do, which is survive. Yes, for an immortal consciousness to get on the kick of trying to survive as an immortal biological entity could be kind of nuts, don't you think? Well, join with me in having a good laugh as I quote the lines of an early Scientologist by the name of William Shakespeare, whose character Puck in _Midsummer Night's Dream_ said, "What fools these mortals be!" and enjoy the startling realization that Basic-Basic is probably not the sperm-ovum sequence but simply the intention to be human. Thank you for bearing with me in this, my midsummer night's dream, and I shall look forward to the silent minority and majority of IVy subscribers piping up to set the record straight as I retire to my alfalfa farm and count sheep as sleep o'ercomes my soul. Love, Phil