************************************************************************ The following first appeared in the private email list IVy-subscribers, which is available to all those who subscribe to the printed magazine, International Viewpoints. Home Page: http://home8.inet.tele.dk/ivy/ - with extensive links to FZ! ***************************************************************** Subj: IVy: It doesn't get any worse Date: 16 Aug. 1998 19:28 EDT From: PJSpickler@aol.com Sender: owner-ivy-subscribers@lightlink.com To: ivy-subscribers@lightlink.com ** ("53. A stable datum is necessary for the alignment of data.") ** The following message is relayed to you by ivy-subscribers. ** In adventuring onto the whole track, circa the earlier 1950's, which are sometimes known as the "fun period" of Scientology, it came to pass that in a place called Phoenix, Arizona, USA, a fairly largeish redhaired fellow with a penchant for streaking across the desert on motorcycles had set up a bit of an organization which may have been located at a place called Alice's Ghost Lodge, and for a time was busy giving public lectures called the Grapefruit Grove Lectures. (I will accept help and correction from other old-timers on that which follows, or precedes.) Some of the most fun things that came out of this period were known as the Axioms for an Atomic Era; the first (and possibly the most significant, if you look at the course of this adventuring redhead), was as follows: IF YOU NEED A DATUM, CREATE 'UM. I could really wax eloquent on that axiom, and spend the next 25 trillion electrons talking about possibilities inherent in that one simple statement, but I have high hopes that the philosophers and non-philosophers that are to be found among the IVy subscribers will pick up the gauntlet thrown down by that statement (forgive the metaphor) and, once they stop c0gniting, they'll have something to say about it. Axiom 2: IF YOU'RE MAPPED, YOU'RE TRAPPED. This one should get a rise out of all you theta-MEST theorists, and my further hope is that some other old-timers may know the rest of the axioms. I once had a bunch more, but alas, my retrieval unit can't get past those two. Since this communication is to be considered a potpourri, I shall jump to another topic, with the briefest of communication bridges, and hope that you adventurous souls will make the jump with me with no diminishment of good feeling. Ran into Ron in Washington, D.C. in January of 1957. Ran into L. Ron Hubbard, Jr. at the same time. He was locally referred to as Nibs, and there was no question who his father was. In those days the father and son got along famously, and Lord help you if they ganged up on you, since they had more thetan abilities than any other 50 people I knew at the time. One of the biggest and the best of their abilities had to do with that very scarce, extremely valuable, tremendously desirable particle known as admiration. They both had the ability to mock up a tremendous beam or particle of the stuff and send it your way, at which point, for want of a better term, a general feeling of ecstasy could be felt through every molecule of that which was capable of feeling. It didn't seem to matter what kind of day you were having, or how solid your case had gotten, or how bad your present time or chronic problems were feeling -- just let one of the Hubbards shoot this beam at you, and WHAM -- you'd be floating around on Cloud #9, no kidding. The thing I'm talking about here is non-verbal; you could say it's non-specific too; it was simply pure essence of admiration This was one of the numerous abilities that were worked on in the OT period in Phoenix, and needless to say, some of the folks really got it. In the simplest terms I can employ, most of what folks would call their case would consist of all kinds of solid, serious, unpleasant masses that contained undesirable or detested significances that have unwelcome influence and that are so hard to get rid of you'd spend quite a bit of time and money or just about do anything to change the condition. I've even known folks who've done things in an effort to get their case handled like joined the Sea Org or mortgaged their house to get money for auditing or -- well, I won't go any further, it's too embarrassing, when you think of what people will do for the want of a little admiration for some of their creations (some of which they've acquired with a little help from their friends) that they're not being very responsible for. It had long been said, in various of the early organizations that Ron inhabited, that 3 to 5 hours of auditing with Ron could be like 25 or 50 or more hours with another ordinarily fine auditor. There are many from this period that would agree with that statement. So folks might come to a place like Phoenix or Wichita or Washington, D.C. and, if Ron was in the mood, for a lot of extra money, they could get what seemed to be a short intensive with him, namely 3 to 5 hours. And yes, they would come away from this auditing, to coin an old expression, really blown away, translated as all the needles and all the tone arms of all the different areas of their universe called case were all floating. You ask, what was the big difference between Ron's auditing, or his son Nibs', and the rest of us jokers? Well, I'll tell you: when they sat down in front of a preclear, that pc was now sitting in front of a completely uninhibited source of admiration, and perhaps for the first time in many an eon was experiencing an admiration or a granting of beingness or an acknowledgment that hadn't the smallest shred of reserve or equivocation in it. You say, well, what was getting acknowledged? I'd say it was about at this level: it was an acknowledgment in the fullest sense, with total appreciation for all that that pc ever had been, was now, or ever would be. In the face of that, most pc's, if you remember the 3 great automaticities that were discovered in 1958, namely, the three things that everybody is doing on full automatic, and they are: Keep it from going away, Hold it still, and Make it a little more solid -- those were the big buttons that produced the 1958 Clear -- anyway, in the face of the giant acknowledgment, the beam of admiration, most beings simply ceased keeping it from going away, stopped holding it still, and quit making it a little more solid, namely, their case, which would just go flying off like a rocket launch. In other words, everybody quit mocking it up -- WOW! Nothing there! Many floating needles! Hey, I'm Clear! Hey, I have no track, no charge! Hey, I'm -- WOW! (Tune into my next offerring to find out what causes this condition not to persist, although you could know or cognite on it without any further nonsense from me.) Can auditors still do this today? Could we even do quite a bit of it for ourselves and others in just the daily scene of existence? The answer, the Hubbardian "You betcha!" You may ask, "Does this contravene the notion of TR-O? Is it a mistake for an auditor to sit there radiating admiration and appreciation for that which is presented by the preclear?" Well, in answer, justlisten to this. Definition: TR-O -- being there with nothing or auditing. Definition of auditing -- anything that reduces the charge of the Time Track and restores self-determinism. Yes, you'd better be admiring that pc! thank you. Finally, let's talk briefly about the most unpopular idea in this or any universe (I think), namely that dirty word, yes, you know what I mean: RESPONSIBILITY. There's a very ugly truth concerning responsibility, and at the risk of being the object of eternal damnation from all foolish enough to read these words, yet I would fain mention that which became known as THAT HIDEOUS TRUTH. (This, by the way, is not a take-off on a C.S. Lewis book -- if, however, you are curious about C.S. Lewis, my sweet darling wife Julie informs me that he is an English author who used the word "hideous" in one of the titles of a trilogy that he wrote sometime possibly just before or even during World War II.) Anyway, back to the hideous truth. Each person is exactly as responsible as they wish to be on any given dynamic. You can immediately see why this is a very unpopular idea, since we spend about 99 percent of our theta free time coming up with why's and wherefore's to avoid the awesome possibilities, as well as the awesome punishments, that await those who are willing to admit cause or (unpleasantly) have been found to be at cause. So it's quite possible that the rewards and the punishments for responsibility are about the same in size. Obviously, some of us have taken the punishments a bit too seriously now, because there is a general tendency away from responsibility. In fact, I wrote a book a few years ago that's entitled _Two Billion Reasons Why I Can't Possibly Be the Cause of What's Going On on Some of the Dynamics That Make Up Life_. This book is just a modest collection of the possibilities in this area that make the pretence of human existence real enough to be enjoyed (and its opposite) by all of us. Well, don't get me wrong, please -- I'm not recommending that anybody out there leap into the vacancy that has been open for a long time for the position called God, or the Supreme Being, or The Creator, namely, that which is responsible for all creation and counter-creations on all 8 dynamics -- no, no, no, I'm not for a minute asking anyone to do that. Perish the thought! I'm just saying that willingness monitors ability, and that if you were willing to be responsible for the affairs of all spiritual entities and all their interactions throughout all the dynamics, the orbits of the planets, the El Nino, all living things, the abject condition of humankind, the embarrassment of the Clinton administration, the sad affairs in South Africa, the great difficulties of the 2nd dynamic in most places in the world, and the general diminishment of the 1st dynamic notion, well, all you'd have to do is decide to do it, and it's yours. You might want to have my book on all the reasons why you couldn't possibly be the cause of all those things at your side, just in case you change your mind. In fact, the recommended end phenomena concerning this notion of responsibility is to reach the state where you could choose to be responsible or not responsible for anything at any time, anywhere -- PHEW!!! Now then, that sounds a lot better, doesn't it? 'Cause I want you to remember that too much responsibility takes you into pan-determinism in any given situation or dynamic and takes you outside the game, and that's no fun. But on the other hand, you don't want to be beating up the children every other day (just kidding). So it might be said that the optimum amount of responsibility, just like the optimum amount of randomity, is the amount that pleases you in the ongoing condition called Life, and once you know you can raise or lower the amount you choose to play with or not play with, you're so darn free I'd never want to talk to you again -- or at least I'd have to get above my chronic level of deathful enthusiasm in order to sit in the same room with you. I'd like to say in closing that back in the '50's, L. Ron Hubbard gave a bunch of lectures which were made into a bunch of booklets called the Lecture Course Booklets. Seems to me they were published with a cover that was a nice green and orange or green and cream or something like that, and there were a whole bunch of them. And in one of the talks Ron gave he made a point of mentioning the effective limits of Scientology as related to the Tone Scale, and I believe he said the territory beyond Tone 27 was both uncharted and past the limits where Scientology could be used effectively. I don't remember if he said how low on the Tone Scale you could go and still find it useful, but someone out there ought to have that answer, either in theory or in direct experience ("Hello there," he said, calling down the deep well). After this last, I'm fleeing into my doubly-fortified cave and setting up several rows of guard sheep as I sit by a tiny fire, counting the millions of separate stalks of alfalfa that i am carefully hoarding, with a soft giggle and a bit of drool running down my cheek. Good night and goodbye, and all the best -- Phil **